During development I encountered a caveat: Opus 4.5 can’t test or view a terminal output, especially one with unusual functional requirements. But despite being blind, it knew enough about the ratatui terminal framework to implement whatever UI changes I asked. There were a large number of UI bugs that likely were caused by Opus’s inability to create test cases, namely failures to account for scroll offsets resulting in incorrect click locations. As someone who spent 5 years as a black box Software QA Engineer who was unable to review the underlying code, this situation was my specialty. I put my QA skills to work by messing around with miditui, told Opus any errors with occasionally a screenshot, and it was able to fix them easily. I do not believe that these bugs are inherently due to LLM agents being better or worse than humans as humans are most definitely capable of making the same mistakes. Even though I myself am adept at finding the bugs and offering solutions, I don’t believe that I would inherently avoid causing similar bugs were I to code such an interactive app without AI assistance: QA brain is different from software engineering brain.
Waning Crescent - A thin sliver of light remains on the left side before going dark again.
，详情可参考服务器推荐
The website you are visiting is protected.
（八）协助人民政府或者街道办事处做好与居民利益有关的其他工作；
值得一提的是，在该矿山周边220公里处，全球矿业巨头巴里克黄金运营着非洲最大的金矿Kibali，其经济效益有目共睹。此番盛屯矿业落子刚果金，无疑是希望在铜钴业务之外，再造一个新的黄金增长极。